• Widdershins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve seen images of men with their testicles in a tourniquet and they did not look well at all. They weren’t even bleeding that much. It was less of a medical emergency and more of a hobby it seems.

  • daannii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    That big artery in the inner thigh. … Yeah you can die pretty fast if it gets severed.

    Femoral artery.

    • Thorry@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      30 days ago

      A friend of mine got heart surgery through his inner thigh. That artery is huge, so it provides easy access to the heart without needing to go near any organs. It still creeps me out to think about it, on the other hand it is pretty awesome that’s technologically feasible and provides a much safer procedure with a shorter recovery period.

      • Agrivar@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        30 days ago

        I had an arterial stent placed via the femoral artery. Trust me, it’s pretty dang nice having a tiny scar so high on my inner thigh that my hanging balls hide it instead of a huge one on my chest!

    • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      30 days ago

      there’s a similar one on your arm. the one they give you IVs in. fun fact i was getting an IV removed and i had a fairly new RN (first year on the floor but damned competent. third day on my room and we’d gotten to become friendly. i’m pretty sure she had a family member who’d had a port and had been their caregiver or something) and she had just popped the catheter out of my AC. she pressed down with the cotton ball with her other thumb and… missed. GOOOOSH GOOOOSH GOOOOSH GOOOOSH goes my antecubital all over the room and she turns green. runs out of the room as i slowly and calmly (because i am high as balls on the good hospital painkillers) reach over and put some pressure on. about 30 seconds later she comes back in with a big gauze, i have the bleeding stopped and there were five great big red streaks all across the room. And her now that i think about it i am sure i was so embarrassed i couldn’t look her in the eye. I think i traumatized that poor woman. i’m just like “hey” You really can’t control your instincts until you’ve been through it once or twice.

      • daannii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        29 days ago

        Once at a pet store , I reached in the cage to pet a jumbo rat that was sitting out for adoption (cause I love animals) but it bit me. And just happened to hit some main artery in my finger (I didn’t even know bigger ones were in the finger,). I pull my hand back and literally spray blood, 6 feet in diameter around the whole area. It’s on the floor. The cage. The table. The shelf. Like looked like someone got stabbed. And it was just a small puncture bite.

        I mean it hurt but I was distracted by all the mess. So I wrap my gushing finger. And try to clean up my blood that’s everywhere cause I didn’t want a minimum wage worker to have to do it.

        My bf at the time was a very squeamish guy. I actually saw his lips turn blue at the sight and I thought he was going to faint. (Yeah a grown man).

        So I had to drive us both to the ER where I got a tetanus shot and a bandaid. (Not much to do for punctures).

        Also my insurance wanted me to sue the pet store but I refused. They called multiple times. Wanted me to say the pet store was liable for the ER visit.

        Which certainly would have resulted in someone losing their minimum wage job.

        The hospital wanted me to report the animal to have it euthanized. I refused (literally my fault. ). .anywho.

        I just remembered all the blood. And it happened so fast.

        Lucky it was just a finger and I easily put pressure on it and stopped it pretty fast.

        I’ve never put my hand in an unknown animal cage again. 😅

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          29 days ago

          i was on the way to the pet store later tonight (to get a therapeutic bag of kitty litter to ragepunch) and you may have just saved me from getting catscratched

  • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    30 days ago

    Believe it or not, that’s actually one of the more recent revisions to the training. The military has been training to aim for the dick area because everyone has plates that protect center-mass these days. You cannot effectively move AND have armor that restricts your legs from working.

    • janewaydidnothingwrong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      29 days ago

      This is true, we were taught that the “hip box” was a prime target zone for many reasons, body armor being one but also since the pelvic girdle is a main support nexus for musculature, if it is damaged then most of the body is out of commission. Plus, there is a very high likelihood that the femoral artery will be damaged and if so a target is likely to bleed out in a matter of seconds.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        30 days ago

        You got any stats on that? Because I feel like gender-myths shouldn’t be propagated one way or the other when they’re not true.

        Because I can’t find stuff to support your statement.

        What I do find is Men are more accurate than women in aiming at targets in both near space and extrapersonal space

        Men outperformed women on both the extrapersonal aiming tasks, and women outperformed men on the task of fine motor skill. However, a male advantage was observed for one of the aiming tasks performed in near space, suggesting that the male advantage for aiming accuracy does not result from proximity

        But then again also

        Close women, distant men: line bisection reveals sex-dimorphic patterns of visuomotor performance in near and far space

        The mid-points of a series of lines which were positioned both within hand-reach (near space) and beyond hand-reach (far space) were estimated by 24 women and 24 men. When using a laser pointer to perform estimations, women were more accurate in the near condition than the far, whereas men were more accurate in the far condition than the near. When using a stick pointer for the far condition, women were more accurate than when using the laser, whereas men were more accurate using the laser pointer than the stick for the far condition. There was no difference between near and far accuracy scores for either sex using the stick. These results suggest that use of a tool which provides proprioceptive feedback causes the brain to remap far-space stimuli as if situated in near space.

        Being amazing at shooting is more an individual trait than anything tied strictly to sex.

        I’m not saying women aren’t better marksmen, I’ve heard that as well. But I served with a bunch and none of them were especially crack shots. They weren’t especially bad either. I never thought it’s got that much to do with genes or hormones, really. So I’d be interested to see if there is science showing women really are better on average.

          • Dasus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            30 days ago

            No, I didn’t ask you specifically, but I asked the internet in general and you’re a part of it, so technically yeah I sort of asked you as well. The wider audience.

            Thanks for the link.

            “At low force levels” could be further specified, because I’d like to note that most weapons actually weigh a bit. Ofc if you’re a sniper, you’re looking for a spot where you can use something to hold your weapon instead of using muscles for a static hold.

            My point is that while that’s a difference, yeah, I don’t think it’s enough to conclude women are better marksmen, as are neither of the studies I linked. Thanks anyway.

        • Art3mis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          29 days ago

          I have no real source. Just personal anecdotes and what ive been told. Afaik, its not a biological avantage. Women just tend to be more relaxed and less prone to showing off which shows up as an uptick of performance in fields where precision is important

          • Dasus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            29 days ago

            Yet I’ve shot with a lot of women. Like a literal army’s worth. There was no difference, except perhaps one leaning to men having the advantage, but I don’t see a causation other than Finnish dad’s preferring to teach their sons over their daughters.

            However the differences I did see weren’t accounted for by any gender difference and the women certainly weren’t that much worse. I’d say the larger difference was city-folk vs people’s who grew up rural. Rural people’s could shoot, whatever they happened to have between their legs, (as well as use axes without putting their own ears at risk,) and city-folk were, well, less-able. Less trained would probably be the correct choice of words.

            As I grew up rural, my dad made me shoot my first shotgun and .308 and an officer’s side-arm (which for my great-grandpa was a tiiiiiiny little pistol you couldn’t hit jack shit with from >10 yards) at the ripe age of 12 and my I shot my first AR at 13, I was fair bit more trained than most of the people I went to the army with.

            But of those I did shoot with, I just wouldn’t say women are better marksmen. I know it’s a common myth, because the Soviets had female snipers. But that’s just it. It’s myth. Much like “carrots make you able to see in the dark.” It’s not straight up untrue, it’s just not true either.

            • Art3mis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              29 days ago

              Well me and the girls are better shots than any of the guys we shoot with but fair enough lmao

              • Dasus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                29 days ago

                And I believe you are. But that doesn’t mean women are better at shooting than men. It just means you are good at it.

                • Art3mis@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  29 days ago

                  Yes. Thats what personal anecdotes is referring to. The other bit is what ive been told for… well my entire life lol

      • ebolapie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        29 days ago

        Women can be very good marksmen. If the implication here is that I don’t think there are real photos of girls with guns that’s not what I’m saying. I’ve just seen two or three posts recently of AI generated photos of girls with guns that replicated the film grain and had this 90s feel to them. One of them was good enough that I didn’t even question it until I read the comments.

        • Art3mis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          29 days ago

          Gotcha. Nah im just being a stinker. I can see why someone would think this could be ai. By the time i had commented that had already been disproven