• NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      I don’t know, we need to do a better job of advertising this stuff if a lot of people don’t know about it. This is one of the few decent things the U.S. is doing.

    • Xell22@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I caught it through NPR maybe a couple weeks before it happened, and some science YouTubers were hype about it, but other than that I caught very little coverage. Not a lot mentioned on here that I saw til the day of or the day before. Not that it wasn’t talked about here before that, but just what I noticed.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Long as we have to depend on chemical propellants, the moon is as far as we’ll ever get

    • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Well the solar panels all deployed and are charging, but yeah using chemical burns isn’t good for much beyond orbital movement

      • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Still need a reliable method to convert the power gained from solar into propulsion with enough force so that it won’t take a decade to get anywhere

        • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          The nuclear reflection engine is still our best bet, I feel like it may take actual zero G experiments to solve but I think we can achieve fusion

    • excral@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 days ago

      The entire NASA budget is less than 3% of the US military budget. NASA or moon missions are really not the reason the US can’t afford health care

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    In 1969, the cold war filled the hearts of the world with dread. Today, we live in times that echo this sentiment.

    The launch of 1969 was made with the hope of a better future, and though we cocked it up a drainpipe the first time, maybe we’ll take the right path and echo the sentiment “for all mankind”.

  • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 days ago

    God speed!

    (As an atheist, and just thankful despite Elon and Trump’s best efforts)

    I’m glad there is diversity and Canadian representation, btw!

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    Can’t we get a single article without mentioning how shitty the U.S is right now? Half of the comments here aren’t even ontopic.

    Going back to the moon is still an engineering feat, even if we’ve done it before. That was a generation ago, and all of those engineers are retired or about to.

    • TransNeko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m surprised that Trump didn’t sign an EO declaring that it was now the Trump space mission rather than Artemis II.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        I don’t care what we call it, as long as we keep funding the science and engineering. The amount of people who don’t understand why we should do this stuff is astounding. And I’m honestly not the best at articulating why we should do it.

    • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Can’t we get a single article without mentioning how shitty the U.S is right now? Half of the comments here aren’t even on topic.

      My friend, the toilet was clogged on the rocket.

      Toilet= shitty

      Seems on topic to me

    • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I don’t see the point of sending people to the moon or Mars. It will always be insanely expensive to do anything there, always. What is there to discover that can’t be done with robots? Doing it for the poetic sake of doing it--“going where no man has gone before”-- seems impractical and wasteful.

      Yes, we’ve done it in the past, exploring, that doesn’t mean we must keep doing it as it becomes more impractical, and with what benefits, exactly? Exploiting whatever resources are there? Is that really what we should be doing?

      • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        The moon is a good stopping off point for the rest of the solar system. Launching interplanetary missions from the moon is much easier assuming a moon base exists

  • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Sometimes I regret that if I had been more of a motivated person in my younger years, I could be in space.

    But also, I know that given my physical state and brain damage and such, it was a dead dream as soon as my first stroke happened, two days after birth.

    Still, a woman can dream.

  • JATth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    They launched the integrity of the USA off the planet, so it won’t bother them anymore for a few days.

  • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    whew. i’ve rolled the dice on my life, but i’ve never gotten on a boeing spacecraft. and the shitter’s already clogged.

    • CptEnder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      SLS is mostly designed by Lockeed-Martin and NASA SRC. Boeing was a private contractor too though. This is also the first space toilet we’ve put in a spacecraft and exactly why we’re doing this test flight.

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Right, my mistake. Shitter is clogged tho. Seriously. I know how to design a clogproof shitter (you need a mashing stick) and look what they did.

        • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          Space toilets are complicated. They don’t have gravity assisting the flush. You’d be surprised how even simple stuff we take for granted on Earth is complex when you take away gravity.

          • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            yeah i am making a little fun because oh my gods why did they not consult the spends their entire life on the toilet community because we can solve any toilet clogging problem with a wire hangar.

    • CptEnder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Had the live stream on all day, I jumped up when the clock hit T-0 yelling “fly girl FLY!” Most powerful rocket NASA has launched, I definitely teared up. We need more of this. The possibilities to show what good humanity can do.

    • FEIN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      it must be one thing to experience living near an airport. then it must be another thing to experience living near a rocket launchpad