Holy shit, that website can kiss my ass. I hate when sites hijack the back button.
Also, this story shows he is either negligently stupid, intentionally covering up an accident that he thought might implicate him, or intentionally malicious. Some of the mistakes are pretty damning for someone who had made this climb 14 or 15 times. The timeline is suspicious, too. I have no idea if he did anything intentionally, but he certainly made many very bad mistakes that could together constitute criminal negligence in my head.
That’s daily mail for you, UK’s tabloid akin to the New York Post.
Don’t know much about this case, but that it has occurred twice appears to be pretty damning. Yikes.
Daily Mail is crap.
Ty for this.
Okay, so, with the amount of evidence at hand, how do y’all judge? All I know is that if I accidentally caused or was part of an innocent person’s death, I would avoid anything related to it, not just out of fear it could happen again but out of trauma and guilt. Why did this happen twice? It’s pretty clear to me.
