Epzillon@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 7 hours agono one can understand AIlemmy.worldimagemessage-square15linkfedilinkarrow-up1131arrow-down15
arrow-up1126arrow-down1imageno one can understand AIlemmy.worldEpzillon@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 7 hours agomessage-square15linkfedilink
minus-squareEpzillon@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·4 hours agoYes, it is inherently incorrect, I just think that increases the fun factor. It reminds me of that guy who wrote a prime-checker for his thesis and it was just a massive list of if-statement
minus-squareweps@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 hours ago98% accurate prime checker, super fast isPrime() return False;
Yes, it is inherently incorrect, I just think that increases the fun factor. It reminds me of that guy who wrote a prime-checker for his thesis and it was just a massive list of if-statement
98% accurate prime checker, super fast
isPrime() return False;