COLOURS ARE FUCKING COLOURS. WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU DOING, FRANCE?!

  • Lumidaub@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    I know you’re not speaking English while complaining about irregular grammar in other languages, I just know.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    12 days ago

    Big complaints from someone with a language where the connection between the written text and its pronunciation can only be described as rather weak.

    • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      English is a wreck of three other languages but at least we escaped gendered nouns and adjectives. That’s got to be the most pointless language feature of all time.

        • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          Not really, even that has almost completely fallen out of use. Everything except people and anthropomorphized animals like pets are ‘it’; nobody’s going around calling ships and newspapers ‘she’ anymore except people holding on to extremely quaint historical oddity.

      • Siegfried@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        It is the same word

        Edit: i still understand being puzzled by this, but the thing is, learning a language partially forces you to learn how the native speakers think… i would even argue that is the final milestone on learning a language.

        Spanish found a way to supress the subject from it’s sentences

        Germans speak as if they were assembling a puzzle

        Japanese looks like a programming language… pretty neat

        Russian has two different plurals and the quantity that makes a word fall in the first one or the second one is “arbitrary”.

        I know this looks like a gigantic mountain to climb, but i assure you that as you advance, things will progressively make more sense

        spoiler

        That does not apply to the numbers… it feels like a toddler forgot how to count and started making up shit. What really bothers me is not that but the amiguity… 4 20 sounds exactly as 80

        • Peacepath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          It is not an ambiguity, it is a remaining from a popular way to count. Just as you may count per hundreds and 4 100 sounds like 400, and means it. But you may also count things by dozen (most likely for eggs…).

          Yet you may use “octante” (beligum) or “huitante” (swiss) instead of “quatre-vingt”.

          • Siegfried@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 days ago

            You are right… i never paid attention to it cause spanish does not have this until 1000

            4 (cuatro), 100 (cien), 400 (cuatrocientos)

            4, 1000 (mil), 4000 (cuatromil)

            Thanks, this helps me

  • Hlodwig@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 days ago

    Bruh its like spanish with -a or -o suffixes…

    In french you just add -e at the end (like brun/brune), in this case you have to add an h cause blance is ugly, so its blanche, and every word ending with a c is the same (sec/sèche for example). Pretty normal…

  • Caveman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    Next topic: When and when not to pronounce a consonant as schwa /ə/.

    Spoiler: It depends

  • ☭SaltyIcetea☭ @lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    thats why i hate languages. they have like 500 rules, and then break them half of the time and you just have to know when that is the case