• zikzak025@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Not to say this shouldn’t be treated with the gravity it deserves, but are there any media outlets reporting on this other than the Daily Mail? Not exactly known for being the most reliable rag out there.

    • kingofras@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Upvoting for visibility.

      OP account has a very suspicious posting pattern.

      Daily mail is just shit stirring. And OP is diluting Lemmy with average to terrible content farming easy upvotes to dilute average post quality.

      • noumenon@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        You’ve gone WAY too far spamming your labels on me and my posts. I’m not a damn bot! The top mods know me. It seems difficult for people to imagine that I’m just really engaged.

        Would you like a timeline of when I get home from work, when I have a meal, and when I go to bed so you can draw up a quality infographic of my posting patterns?

        Okay, so Daily Mail is a questionable source. My bad, I should have looked them up on Ground News, AllSides, Ad Fontes Media, and Media Bias Fact Check.

        I do this to inform, to be a sort of “human network tower”, relaying information at a quick pace. It’s stimulating and I enjoy it.

        Please get off me.

      • slaacaa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        You’re right, OP is a 14 days old account with around 1200 posts, holy shit. Either a bot or a crazy person, I’m blocking them

    • GreenShimada@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I also thought this headline happened like 3 months ago when all this stupid stuff started. I can’t find anything other than other “news” outlets obviously just copying this headline.

  • Bullerfar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Dangerious to give a sociopath any success on militiary operations and no consequences for the acts of violence. He will just think: “was this an option all along!? Lets do it everytime!”

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The US is now, definitely, “the baddies”.

    If the rest of us have to band together and start liberating countries from them, I’ll be pissed.

  • wuffah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    14 hours ago

    But such a dramatic move would put him at odds with Sir Keir Starmer and would effectively lead to the collapse of NATO.

    According to the sources, the President has asked the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) to prepare the invasion plan, but it is being resisted by the joint chiefs of staff on the grounds that it would be illegal - and would not be supported by Congress

    Invading and occupying sovereign first world nations is entirely different from decapitating lesser authoritarian regimes. If Trump is successful in forcing the military to invade Greenland, we are in deep shit. A war between NATO and the US would quickly lead to nuclear escalation, and appeasement would only lead to the further collapse of NATO and the empowerment of worldwide totalitarian expansionism.

    The American government is being run by insane megalomaniacal fascists. All the pieces are in position for WWIII. Trump must be stopped IMMEDIATELY or it’s time to start digging bomb shelters in our backyards.