• SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Meat lobbyists forcing regulations on products that threaten the meat industry.

    Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

    • FelixCress@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Nothing will meaningfully improve

      It just did. European Parliament voted for regulations protecting consumers from deception used by the plant pulp industry.

        • TWeaK@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s not about accidentally eating vegetables, it’s about products being marketed in a misleading way. If I order a pizza with bacon on it, I don’t want turkey, let alone a vegetable substitute.

          However many terms are already agnostic, eg pattie, burger; these kind of things should be allowed. Also, “cooks like ground beef” isn’t a problem, however maybe the way the words highlight “ground beef” might be. Like, the “cooks from” and “made from plants” are white text on a light coloured background, as if to try and make it easier to miss.

          There are already laws against intentionally misleading people with advertising. Done properly, this is just an extension of that, to counter businesses trying to get around the current law.

          • Ogy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I have no problems with anything you say - as a vegetarian, Id also like to be able to distinguish between products and ensure Im getting plant based stuff.

            However, you should keep in mind that this is not the actual intention of the meat industry pushing for this. Theyre just trying to fuck with the competition.

      • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yay global warming solved! XD

        /s

        It’s insane seeing adults make these crying baby comments about not eating as much meat so we all don’t boil alive.

        Throw out that pathetic ego, it isn’t doing you any favors.

        • FelixCress@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          It is. It would even be better if all the public lying was banned, not just this one.

  • starlinguk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m guessing they’re trying to distract people from the fact that they’re cutting back sustainability laws even further.

  • stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    You expect this from Texas but are shocked and disappointed when it’s the EU.

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    When has “burger” or “steak” ever exclusively meant meat from an animal? This sounds like political corruption to me. Somebody is getting paid for turning this linguistic gaslighting into law.

    A “burger” has always been a mince patty of any kind and a “steak” is a thick slab of something. The default assumption may be meat, but it has never been exclusive.

    Edit
    OP appears to have a serious problem accepting facts. It’s disappointing given the number of upvotes Voyager shows for them. I suppose nobody is perfect.

    • TWeaK@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I agree that burger has always been agnostic, but steak should really just be meat. Etymologically, it was always meat roasted on a stake. Similarly, bacon should just be a specific cut of pig meat, not turkey. Both of these are intentionally misleading marketing - with bacon it’s even so when they’re using different meats, let alone vegetables.

      Intentionally misleading people through advertising, in order to get more sales, is wrong.

      And don’t get me started on American “biscuits” that are not cooked twice. They’re savoury scones.

      • Lorax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        What about steak mushrooms literally their name, cauliflower steak, or something with a wooden steak in it?

        • TWeaK@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          After I posted this comment I looked up the etymology, the word “steak” literally comes from food being roasted on a stake. So, really, that should be the deciding factor - most steak we eat isn’t technically steak because it’s cooked in other ways.

          Brazillian restaurants, the ones that come by with meat on a sword, should count as proper steak. Vegetables cooked in that manner could also be steak.

  • FelixCress@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Good, product names should not be misleading.

    Edit: I wonder what idiots think product names SHOULD be misleading.