• netling@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    23 hours ago

    And close all US military bases in Europe. We don’t need troops from a fascist dictator on our continent.

    • klairman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 minutes ago

      Every day I wonder how on earth we accepted this situation, with honourable exceptions such as the French.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Please do and expel our ambassadors. Close us off and isolate us. I say this because the more it happens. The more the drooling masses here are made to feel the reality of the situation the better. You simply would not believe the level of cognitive dissonance. These people are deluded.

  • yuumei@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Sell US treasuries, or maybe Kier could stop buying them like they are 2 for 1

  • redlemace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Cut all trade. Damn, usa boycot came to the pathetic level i’m not even accepting american-english when installing an o/s. It’s a common default, but i scroll to uk or canadian english. Pathetic, i know, yet here we are.

        • kubofhromoslav@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          English, as an national language, is great for national communication.

          But using national language for international communication is like using black-white television to watch a color movie - it kind of works, but it definitely loses a lot.

          There are at least 2 important factors:

          1. neutrality: English used for international communication favors people from English speaking countries. Inside of Europe that is not to big problem, because Ireland and Malta, while being great counties, have relatively small population - so English can work as a reasonably neutral language for European communication. But when it comes to Europe in world - English is used but a country that left us and by country that wages trade war against us. That highlights that English definitely is not a worldwide neutral language.

          2. ease of use: Esperanto was designed to be easy to learn and use, while functioning very well as a mean of communication. It does not carry a burden of centuries of non-systemic evolution, so it does not have things like irregular verbs. It’s grammar is very regular with simple rules. It enables creating words with a set of prefixes and sufixes so one does not need to learn a bunch of new (different) words about related things (like: to eat, to snack, to feast, food, meal, cantina, utensils, etc. - they are manĝi, manĝeti, manĝegi, manĝo, manĝaĵo, manĝejo, manĝiloj etc). Experience shows that learning Esperanto is 5-10x faster that learning national languages. It’s just much not efficient.

          Than comes other factors, like pushing some way of thinking, usual for one specific nation, to all humankind, atc, but those 2 are the basic ones.

  • Lucky_777@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    The greatest weapon against the US is not bombs or military. It’s selling us shit! We can’t survive in isolation, consumer economy has fucked us for decades. Cut all trade and stop selling us products. Then we fall fast.