I can. You have people of a world view that women are objects that are created soley to serve men, in any way they see fit. Those people migrate in societies where women are treated equal. The same migrants have in their world view that such women should be killed because of doing things they consider illegal in their world view, ignoring the fact that killing in the local society is unacceptable.
And now, think as a father of a daughter who sees more and more men migrating into your society who think your daughter should be killed for the way she dressed, and will not restrain from killing her if they decide to do so in their own world view.
Find a way to tell me we should accept those immigrants, with directly opposing world views to ours, which think what we consider a crime is moral and necessary, into our society and accomodate for their needs. Accept them. Knowing very well we would probably be killed for being us in their own country.
You may be referring to the immigrations in the US, but having a problem with a Latino and having a problem with a jihadi man is not the same.
There are plenty of reasons, whether or not any are good is opinion.
Daniel Berntsson is known to be against authoritarianism, censorship and mass surveillance, three things which are growing rapidly globally and in Europe (specifically the EU) people are noticing it now for the first time.
Many believe (I have no idea if he is one of them) that it is easier to do when society and cultures are mixed. But they may not be against integration, immigration itself for example, but just the scale and speed.
It is surely no coincidence (without having to don too much of a tinfoil hat) that these ‘summit’ meetings and other similar ones started happening, and are all in private (allegedly for security - but in fact the only people not made privy to them are the voters/plebs), for a reason, along with what has been happening in the world since they really started about 50 years ago.
You are right (as is everyone) to question peoples motivations, but that should go both ways.
The poster below in the all capitals just sounds petulant and doesn’t really seem to get that they are making the same point back.
The people to be angry at, on every single occasion, are the government. Look at why x, y or z is happening. Disruption is as good a tool as many.
A sure fire way to make things even easier for them to control us all, is to bring in higher numbers and faster and confuse many of the people. While we are all looking there, they are locking down other areas at an alarming rate.
If it is so easy for the EU commission which is showing signs of corruption more and more (it’s as if they can’t wait long enough) to ignore or brush aside those millions today, imagine how easy it will be in a few years with higher numbers.
Question everything on all sides. Why is something happening and why are so many pushing against it?
Unfortunately, yes, it does often just come down to petty racism and ignorance. But I have little doubt that much of that is orchestrated too, especially when you see who is behind much of it.
The only thing capitals boy got right, is that there are bad people everywhere.
Always wait and see their reasons first. Sure a lot of the time it’s for bad reasons but occasionally it’s not so clear.
I can’t think of a single good reason one could have for this.
I can. You have people of a world view that women are objects that are created soley to serve men, in any way they see fit. Those people migrate in societies where women are treated equal. The same migrants have in their world view that such women should be killed because of doing things they consider illegal in their world view, ignoring the fact that killing in the local society is unacceptable.
And now, think as a father of a daughter who sees more and more men migrating into your society who think your daughter should be killed for the way she dressed, and will not restrain from killing her if they decide to do so in their own world view.
Find a way to tell me we should accept those immigrants, with directly opposing world views to ours, which think what we consider a crime is moral and necessary, into our society and accomodate for their needs. Accept them. Knowing very well we would probably be killed for being us in their own country.
You may be referring to the immigrations in the US, but having a problem with a Latino and having a problem with a jihadi man is not the same.
There are plenty of reasons, whether or not any are good is opinion. Daniel Berntsson is known to be against authoritarianism, censorship and mass surveillance, three things which are growing rapidly globally and in Europe (specifically the EU) people are noticing it now for the first time. Many believe (I have no idea if he is one of them) that it is easier to do when society and cultures are mixed. But they may not be against integration, immigration itself for example, but just the scale and speed.
It is surely no coincidence (without having to don too much of a tinfoil hat) that these ‘summit’ meetings and other similar ones started happening, and are all in private (allegedly for security - but in fact the only people not made privy to them are the voters/plebs), for a reason, along with what has been happening in the world since they really started about 50 years ago.
You are right (as is everyone) to question peoples motivations, but that should go both ways. The poster below in the all capitals just sounds petulant and doesn’t really seem to get that they are making the same point back. The people to be angry at, on every single occasion, are the government. Look at why x, y or z is happening. Disruption is as good a tool as many.
Only in the past couple of weeks alone we have seen SKG be pretty much pushed aside by the EU with over 1.5m signatures, a petition for questioning Israeli lobbying in the UK with almost 120,000 signatures forced debate and ignored, and Chat Control (which has failed twice) attempts to be reignited which is unprecented and goes against what the whole ‘poltical system’ is supposed to stand for. I am sure that there are many more.
A sure fire way to make things even easier for them to control us all, is to bring in higher numbers and faster and confuse many of the people. While we are all looking there, they are locking down other areas at an alarming rate.
If it is so easy for the EU commission which is showing signs of corruption more and more (it’s as if they can’t wait long enough) to ignore or brush aside those millions today, imagine how easy it will be in a few years with higher numbers.
Question everything on all sides. Why is something happening and why are so many pushing against it?
Unfortunately, yes, it does often just come down to petty racism and ignorance. But I have little doubt that much of that is orchestrated too, especially when you see who is behind much of it.
The only thing capitals boy got right, is that there are bad people everywhere.