Convicted of being a former Harvard scientist?
Titlegore. If it’s not legible to a moron (me) - rewrite it.
On the other hand, article titles should (must, it’s in the rules) be copied verbatim.
Which this is.
I think they meant that publisher should have rewritten it.
Also, the community rules allow for adding context in [brackets] as long as it is not editorialized.
I’m not seeing that in the rules for this community.
It’s also not that difficult to parse. Can’t write everything for 1% of the population.
And even then, almost any added context will be biased, there’s a reason why it’s usually not allowed. Leave that for the comments or post text.
Oh yeah I get that, grumbling to the editor that came up with it, not the Lemmy poster.
Though OP has not bothered to add the missing context in the comment of the post, which is definitely allowed on the rules.
