• ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.mlBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Haha, it’s usually worse than that. Especially if you do manual labor and don’t have a union. Friend of mine was receiving 6% of the value of his labor after we calculated it.

    • Maroon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Sorry for my ignorance, but how do you calculate the “value” of one’s labour? Like how would you do this for a school teacher?

      Different schools have different pay grades, different subjects, etc.

      • Proles_Uprising_Now@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        If a private school makes 100 million a year in profit and pays you, the only employee 6 million that would be 6 percent of your value. I think.

        • Vincentmario@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          You’re interpreting a child being the subject of the statement. For this to be true, the original text would need to say ‘a child’. Only then would the sentence mean there’s a child going about eating paedophiles

          • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            No I’m not, I’m interpreting it as the object of the preposition by. The lack of hyphenation means that child is either a noun which is eating pedophiles or an adjective describing pedophiles who are eating. Presumably neither is what the author intended.

            • Vincentmario@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              It says “stolen by child eating pedophiles”. The preposition “by” takes a noun phrase as its object.That noun phrase is “child eating pedophiles”. The head noun is clearly pedophiles. “child eating” is a modifier (a compound/participle phrase) describing those pedophiles

              Hyphenation would make it clearer, but its absence doesn’t suddenly create a new valid reading where “child” becomes a separate noun or the main object

              Gamer and yeah

              • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                “Child eating” is not a compound modifier, that’s what the hyphen does. Without a hyphen, the modifiers “child” and “eating” both independently describe “pedophiles”, the hyphen makes “child-eating” into the compound adjective the author was obviously intending to convey. Wikipedia uses the example “heavy-metal detector”. Without the hyphen, you have a metal detector that’s heavy. If you need a device to detect heavy-metals, your SOL.

                Absolutely no clue what “gamer and yeah” means 🤷‍♂️

                • Vincentmario@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Hyphens clarify compounds, they don’t create them. Grammatically, ‘child eating’ modifies ‘pedophiles’, the head noun. Reading ‘child’ as its own noun would require ‘a child’ or a different construction, which isn’t what’s written.

  • bridgeburner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    Wait you pay that much in taxes in the US? I thought the silver lining of living in the US means lower taxes compared to countries with social security systems and universal healthcare.

    • lovely_reader@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s the line they feed us, for sure. But if you ever actually added up federal income tax, state income tax, state and local sales tax, Social Security tax, property tax and assorted taxes for any instance in which you might come into additional money (capital gains, interest, prize winnings, inheritance, etc. etc. etc.) most Americans would probably be shocked to learn what real percentage of our income we actually pay to the government.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        This is a very good reminder to me. The rich pay comparatively little on things like gas taxes, retail tax, etc.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      No - they just pretend taxes are lower to justify not using the tax money responsibly to provide social services.

      Between federal income tax, social security, and medicaid my taxes come out to about 40% off the top. Then I have to pay state sales tax, local taxes, and in many states people also have to pay state sales tax.

      • Paper_Phrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        What the hell? That is an effective tax that is higher than what I pay in one of the richest countries in Europe. Our highest tax bracket is around 50%, but only on that portion. Our effective tax is probably under 40%.

        And we have actual social security and healthcare is covered.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          How else are we supposed to pay oil companies and Monsanto massive subsidies to encourage them to keep participating in their wildly profitable businesses?

    • Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      No see when people produce things they need to get taxed a lot so we can pay for the things they need like prisons, cops, anti homeless architecture, and the military.

      But when people collect stock dividends or realize gains they only need to get taxed a little to cover the contracts they get to provide squalid food to public schools, fill textbooks with revisionist history, and prevent humanities education.

      And of course the true patriots who get loans against the majority stake shares that they manipulate to steal the retirements of prolls and bribe politicians are welcomed to write those incurred debts off.

    • TheHighRoad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s the best part: We don’t know! There are so many taxes and fees and BS spread over so many things that it is very difficult to calculate the total percentage accurately. 40% seems high, but it’s probably not far off when you add everything up.

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Trump paid for showing me (located with an european IP address and an european account) a facebook video ad boasting about how now overtime is tax exempt. It was awesome: it was an ai-generated pixar style ai slop about some men coming back after some work in oil field or coal mine and hugging their kids, opening the letter with a huge “pussy hair” signature saying that now overtime pay is not taxed.